Opening Up...

“We consider ourselves a "tri-relationship" with three equal sides.”
-- Lewis, Turner and Ivan

Non-monogamous blogger lays out the facts

Feb 032012

Samantha Fraser, blogger at Not Your Mother’s Playground, was interviewed for an article on non-monogamy in The Grid, an online city magazine run by the Toronto Star. The piece is decent, but the author spends a lot of time stressing how complicated, confusing, and exhausting non-monogamy seems.

Fraser wasn’t too bothered by the coverage, but she did take the opportunity to clear up some things that the article left murky. In the process, she wrote a blog post more useful than the original article.

To be honest, the only issue that I have with it is that it seems to focus on the fact that — a few months into non-monogamy I struggled extra with the little details — like the visual cue of my husband’s date’s wine glass being left behind in my kitchen. When we were relatively fresh other people fuckers, silly shit like that was hard to handle. So I share those stories with other people because those are the things that threw me for a loop back in the day. A few commenters on the article have latched onto the wine glass story, suggesting that if I’m not comfortable with that then I must not really be happy with non-monogamy at all.

And this is a mild challenge I always see that, for the most part, I ignore. There are a lot of assumptions out there about open relationships. First of all, people will often react strongly when they hear someone is in one. “Isn’t that hard? What about jealousy? What if you fall in love?”. On the flip side however, if I suggest mySELF that non-monogamy is hard and that sometimes those questions can have really tough answers, then I obviously must not be happy with it.

. . . I find this attitude so ridiculous which is why I will constantly strive to be honest when discussing open relationships . . . However in the interest of clarity, I will list a few points here that maybe I haven’t said in some time.

Read Fraser’s list of things she has personally learned from practicing non-monogamy.

 Non-monogamy  No Responses »

Audiobook version of Opening Up

Feb 012012

Yes, it’s true! As of last fall, Opening Up is available as an audiobook. This is my first book ever to be converted into an audiobook, and it’s unabridged — a full 11 hours of non-monogamous goodness. The audiobook is narrated by Jo Anna Perrin and published by Tantor Audio.

You can buy the audiobook online on many sites, such as Amazon, Audible, and Tantor (where it is currently 50% off!). Mp3 audio samples are available on all of those sites, so you can preview the narration before purchase.

 Non-monogamy, Open Relationships, Polyamory  No Responses »

Battling breast cancer with multiple partners

Jan 312012

Allena Gabosch is a polyamorous woman and the founder of Seattle’s Center for Sex Positivity. When she was diagnosed with breast cancer, she turned to her partners for support and comfort. In “Breast Cancer and Polyamory: A Story of Non-Monogamy, Love and Commitment While Going Through Chemo,” Rachel Rabbit White interviews Gabosch about the ups and downs of dealing with cancer as a poly woman.

Gabosch quickly found that being poly was a huge asset in her fight against breast cancer. Her partners were able to comfort each other. Gabosch became much closer with her partner’s primary, Sophie, who treated her with an array of herbal remedies and vitamins, and she bonded with Sophie’s daughter as well. She was always surrounded by love.

The most incredible part was I never went to the oncologist, to chemo, or to surgery without one or more of my partners with me. When I went in for the lobectomy . . . As they were wheeling me away, I showered each lover in kisses. The nurses did look at each other, like, ‘well this is strange.’

There were other unforeseen benefits as well. When Gabosch’s sex drive diminished, she did not have to worry about whether her partners’ sexual needs were being met. Gabosch even met a new partner, right in the middle of her battle.

Dealing with cancer only strengthened Gabosch’s belief in polyamory.

In both cancer and love, for me it is about not being at the whims of society and what you are supposed to do, but being proactive and finding what really works for you, and I think being poly has a lot to do with shaping that idea.

. . . I learned a lot about love and commitment and how committed these people truly are to me. One of the ideas people have about polyamory is “well you guys don’t know how to commit, that is why you are poly” I always knew that wasn’t true but here I was really seeing it, my partners were so committed to me, 100 percent . . . I never lacked for attention for my entire cancer experience, and that is a powerful place to come from.

This interview is an ultimately uplifting reminder of the shortness of life and the importance of support and love. Read the full interview in SexIs Magazine.

 Non-monogamy, Polyamory  No Responses »

Female boxer: polyamorous?

Jan 292012

Listening to Weekend Edition on the local NPR station today, I heard an interesting piece, “‘I Am A Boxer’: Fighter In The Ring, Lady Outside It,” about female boxers who hope to make the U.S. Olympic Team for women’s boxing. The first woman profiled was Bertha Aracil, a 29 year old amateur boxer. Talking about Aracil, reporter Marianne McCune said this (emphasis mine):

When I met her she was living in a basement apartment in the Bronx with a man and a woman she called her husband and her wife. They were cooking for a band of nieces, nephews, and sisters, part of a big family of Cuban immigrants. Aracil is 5’9″ with jeans, boots, she says that her many tattoos tell the story of who she is.

Whoa, what? That’s right. Not only was Aracil clearly open about her nontraditional and nonmonogamous (polyamorous?) relationship, but the NPR reporter treated it as completely ordinary, just part of the profile. Unfortunately, this little item is missing from the written piece on npr.org, but you can download the audio of the segment here.

 Media, Non-monogamy, Open Relationships, Polyamory  No Responses »

The Newt Gingrich controversy

Jan 262012

Wondering what I think about the news that Newt Gingrich asked his wife for an “open marriage”? I was interviewed by both Salon and the BBC about the controversy.

Check out Salon’s article, “Newt Gingrich’s traditional values,” and the BBC’s “Is it possible to have a happy open marriage?”, for quotes from me and other experts.

 Open Relationships  No Responses »

Triad on National Geographic’s “Taboo”

Jan 242012

An equilateral triad family from the San Francisco area was recently profiled in National Geographic’s show Taboo, in an episode entitled “Odd Couples.” The family consists of two men and a woman who have been together for 17 years and are raising a teenager.

In 8 seasons of the show, National Geographic has turned the spotlight on many anthropological practices, such as voodoo, body modification, and initiation rituals, while also tackling topics that are merely unusual, such as strange pets and peculiar foods. Filming of the family took place last June, and there was trepidation over how the segment would be edited.

Thankfully, the family was treated respectfully. Alan M. describes the segment:

What a sweet portrayal it turned out to be, from start to finish! Cuddly kindness and family warmth; intelligence and thoughtfulness — and such a steady smooth flow was evident among these people after their 17 years together. There was some mostly good commentary by a few talking-head experts (Helen Fisher, Peter Singer, Elisabeth Sheff). The 15-year-old in particular was articulate, perceptive, and proud to have so many good parental figures. The show went on for nearly 20 minutes including commercial breaks. It ended with them making a trip to Redwood Forest National Park (above), where they have an annual ritual of renewing their wedding vows.

Check National Geographic’s schedule for air times. The episode cannot be found online at the moment, but you can watch a 3-minute preview on National Geographic’s website.

 Media, Polyamory  No Responses »

An Opening Up read-along!

Jan 202012

Blogger Kit O’Connell has launched an Opening Up read-along! O’Connell is encouraging readers to follow along in Opening Up and engage in discussions about the various chapters — and non-monogamy in general.

Here’s how it will work: each week or so, O’Connell will post about a new section of the book and his thoughts on it, using that as a launching pad for more broad discussion of non-monogamy. He will also share his own experiences in the polyamorous lifestyle.

In this first post, O’Connell writes about the introduction in Opening Up:

In addition to talking about her background and the creation of the book, the introduction to Opening Up takes a look at the state of relationships in our culture today. Most of us grow up believing that lifelong monogamous marriage is not only the current default, but always has been for everyone . . . Countless events (the Stonewall riots), technological developments (birth control), and cultural changes have shown that there is no normal relationship and a lifetime of emotional & sexual monogamy is a rarity and not always a worthwhile or realistic goal.

. . . Opening Up attempts to cover a wide gamut of relationship styles, from polyamory of many kinds, to swinging, to pairings where one person is monogamous and the other poly. It has chapters devoted to major issues which confront us as we explore these new relationship styles, and profiles of how others have shaped their relationships. Remember as we go through this book that, quoting the author, “there is no formula for an open relationship.” There is not even one definition of polyamory. Instead, approach your relationships as you would a toolbox — choose from what works for you and your lovers, without worrying about what you perceive as normal.

The read-along will continue next Thursday, January 26th, with chapter 1, which examines the history of non-monogamy since the 1950s. Go contribute your voice to the discussion and follow along on O’Connell’s blog, Approximately 8,000 Words.

 Non-monogamy, Open Relationships, Polyamory  Comments Off

“Monogamish” couples speak in Savage Love

Jan 182012

In Dan Savage’s recent Savage Love column, entitled “Meet the Monogamish,” he hopes to squash the stereotype that non-monogamy is a recipe for disaster — by simply sharing the stories of non-monogamous folks. Savage writes,

Why do most people assume that all nonmonogamous relationships are destined to fail? Because we only hear about the ones that do. If a three-way or an affair was a factor in a divorce or breakup, we hear all about it. But we rarely hear from happy couples who aren’t monogamous, because they don’t want to be perceived as dangerous sex maniacs who are destined to divorce.

. . . “You know lots of couples who have had three-ways and flings who aren’t divorced,” I told the skeptics a few weeks ago, “you just don’t know you know them.” In an effort to introduce the skeptics to some happily monogamish couples, I invited coupled people who’d had successful flings, affairs, three-ways, and swinging experiences to write in and share their stories.

Seven different letters are printed, ranging from threesomes to semi-open relationships. One reader writes in succinctly:

I agree with you that we rarely hear about successful marriages that are open. How do I know? I just discovered that my parents are swingers — and they have been married for 26 years!

Read the rest of the stories in Savage Love.

 Non-monogamy, Open Relationships, Swinging  Comments Off

What the Canadian ruling means for polyamorists

Jan 162012

It’s been a month and a half since the British Columbia Supreme Court ruled in favor of upholding Canada’s anti-polygamy law and narrowing its scope. In the poly community, nobody was quite sure how to react to the ruling. Now that the dust has settled, the attorney who represented the Canadian Polyamory Advocacy Association in the case has released an open letter to the Canadian polyamory community.

The attorney, John Ince, is poly himself, and although he thinks that the “scope of the prohibition” is too extreme, he believes that the decision is an overall positive one for polyamorists.

In general terms, I think that the decision allows us to do virtually anything the vast majority of polyamorists would want to do . . . His decision makes it clear that polyamorists are not criminals and this is a major step forward for our community to gain social acceptance and become more integrated into mainstream Canadian culture.

The reason for this, Ince explains, is that the ruling only criminalizes institutionalized marriages that are non-monogamous. Due to the definitions of the words “institutionalized” and “marriage,” this law does not apply to poly relationships.

I conclude that given the lack of polyamorous history, sanction or support for “polyamorous marriage,” that polyamorous people cannot form the type of marriages that the judge found are prohibited.

I go so far as to say that even if polyamorous people wanted to form such relationships, they cannot. The whole structure of institutionalization that the judge emphasized over and over again as key to his decision is simply lacking in our community.

. . . Because there is no polyamorous institution of marriage, how far can polyamorous people go in celebrating and formalizing their relationships? In my view: probably as far as they want.

So, polyamorists are free to have ceremonies, take vows of love, and exchange rings. To remove any legal risk, Ince suggests that any commitment ceremony refrain from using the word “marriage,” or if that is not possible, avoid including any “official” in the process. A marriage is not a marriage under the law unless it is enforced by an institutionalized sanctioning authority.

And there are other upsides to the ruling, Ince explains.

Because the court found that polyamorous relationships that are not institutionalized into a form of marriage are lawful, people in such relationships no longer have to face the chilling argument in child custody, immigration or other matters that they are criminals. That is obviously a very positive outcome of this case.

Further, nothing in this case prevents people in cohabiting polyamorous relationships from entering contracts with respect to most key family issues, such as community property and the care of children, and hospital privileges.

For more in-depth, specific information on the implications of the Canadian ruling for the poly community, read Ince’s full statement.

 Polyamory  Comments Off

A polyfi triad on ABC’s “Private Practice”

Jan 122012

Thursday’s season premiere of ABC’s “Private Practice,” a medical drama that chronicles the lives of a group of doctors and patients, contained a surprisingly sympathetic poly-oriented subplot! Alongside other subplots, there’s a polyfi triad — two women and a man — who want to have a child together, and the doctors assist them in their journey.

Alan M. describes the poly subplot in full:

In comes a nice, seemingly conventional lesbian couple, Kendra and Rose, to interview with the fertility specialist. They’ve been together six years and want a child — one woman will be the egg donor, the other will bear the baby. Also along for the interview is the intended sperm donor, Evan . . . When the counselor advises the women that they need to have him sign away parental rights, they balk, and the truth comes out: they’re not actually conventional at all.

“We’re all in love,” they reveal, holding hands.

“We know it sounds crazy—”

As they’re explaining: “That first night was amazing. And, so was the next morning. And, every morning after that. Most mornings.”

. . . The docs in the practice discuss it among themselves. “A what?” “A polyamorous triad.” They debate. “…That’s the same argument that said interracial and same-sex couples shouldn’t have children.” The docs come to agreement: they will do the egg fertilization and implant, as the three wish.

But this is a TV drama, right? An ultrasound reveals a problem.

Read the rest of Alan M.’s account to find out how the storyline resolves itself. Or better yet, check out the 43-minute episode on ABC’s website or on Hulu.

 Media, Polyamory  Comments Off
 Older Entries
© 2010 OpeningUp.net Suffusion theme by Sayontan Sinha